Have you ever wanted to search and fetch barcode data from Bold Systems? I am developing functions to interface with Bold from R. I just started, but hopefully folks will find it useful. The code is at Github here. The two functions are still very buggy, so please bring up issues below, or in the Issues area on Github. For example, some searches work and other similar searches don’t. Apologies in advance for the bugs. ...
We just wrapped up the 2011 iEvoBio meeting. It was awesome! If you didn’t go this year or last year, definitely think about going next year. Here is a list of the cool projects that were discussed at the meeting (apologies if I left some out): Vistrails: workflow tool, awesome project by Claudio Silva Commplish: purpose is to use via API’s, not with the web UI Phylopic: a database of life-form silouhettes, including an API for remote access, sweet! Gloome MappingLife: awesome geographic/etc data visualization interace on the web SuiteSMA: visualizating multiple alignments treeBASE: R interface to treebase, by Carl Boettiger VertNet: database for vertebrate natural history collections RevBayes: revamp of MrBayes, with GUI, etc. Phenoscape Knowledge Base Peter Midford lightning talk: talked about matching taxonomic and genetic data BiSciCol: biological science collections tracker Ontogrator TNRS: taxonomic name resolution service Barcode of Life data systems, and remote access Moorea Biocode Project Microbial LTER’s data BirdVis: interactive bird data visualization (Claudio Silva in collaboration with Cornell Lab of Ornithology) Crowdlabs: I think the site is down right now, another project by Claudio Silva Phycas: Bayesian phylogenetics, can you just call this from R? RIP MrBayes!!!! replaced by RevBayes (see 9 above) Slides of presentations will be at Slideshare (not all presentations up yet) A birds of a feather group I was involved in proposed an idea (TOL-o-matic) like Phylomatic, but of broader scope, for easy access and submission of trees, and perhaps even social (think just pushing a ‘SHARE’ button within PAUP, RevBayes, or other phylogenetics software)! Synopses of Birds of a Feather discussion groups: http://piratepad.net/iEvoBio11-BoF-reportouts
The Public Libraries of Science (PLOS) has an API so that developers can create cool tools to access their data (including full text papers!!). Carl Boettiger at UC Davis and I are working on R functions that use the PLoS API. See our code on Github here. See the wiki at the Github page for examples of use. We hope to deploy rplos as a package someday soon. Please feel free to suggest changes/additions rplos in the comments below or on the Github/rplos site. ...
I am writing some functions to acquire data from the OpenStates project, via their API. They have a great support community at Google Groups as well. On its face this post is not obviously about ecology or evolution, but well, our elected representatives do, so to speak, hold our environment in a noose, ready to let the Earth hang any day. Code I am developing is over at Github. Here is an example of its use in R, in this case using the Bill Search option (billsearch.R on my Github site), and in this case you do not provide your API key in the function call, but instead put it in your .Rprofile file, which is called when you open R. ...
Thanks so much everyone for stopping by!  compares the use of log-transformation to non-linear regression for analyzing power-laws. They suggest that the error distribution should determine which method performs better. When your errors are additive, homoscedastic, and normally distributed, they propose using non-linear regression. When errors are multiplicative, heteroscedastic, and lognormally distributed, they suggest using linear regression on log-transformed data. The assumptions about these two methods are different, so cannot be correct for a single dataset. ...
I am writing a set of functions to search ITIS for taxonomic information (more databases to come) and functions to fetch plant phylogenetic trees from Phylomatic. Code at github. Also, see the examples in the demos folder on the Github site above.
I did a little simulation to examine how K and lambda vary in response to tree size (and how they compare to each other on the same simulated trees). I use Liam Revell’s functions fastBM to generate traits, and phylosig to measure phylogenetic signal. Two observations: First, it seems that lambda is more sensitive than K to tree size, but then lambda levels out at about 40 species, whereas K continues to vary around a mean of 1. Second, K is more variable than lambda at all levels of tree size (compare standard error bars). Does this make sense to those smart folks out there? ...
UPDATE: Greg jordan has a much more elegant way of plotting trees with ggplot2. See his links in the comments below. I wrote a simple function for plotting a phylogeny in ggplot2. However, it only handles a 3 species tree right now, as I haven’t figured out how to generalize the approach to N species. It’s at https://gist.github.com/977207 Any ideas on how to improve this?